The Unity of Shobogenzo
Among the variety of controversies concerning the diversity
of fascicles constituting Shobogenzo
is a tendency to misunderstand and misrepresent individual fascicles as
independent writings rather than parts
of a unified work. Despite the near
universal recognition of Shobogenzo as a unified work (e.g. a masterpiece, the work, etc.), accounts
and commentaries often discuss particular fascicles of Shobogenzo in terms appropriate only for a distinct text, or as one among a disparate collection of writings.
While there are questions as to which particular fascicles legitimately belong
to Shobogenzo, there is no question about the unity of Shobogenzo itself. Indeed, the very question as to which fascicles belong, by
definition, presupposes the unity of Shobogenzo
– if not for their place in that unity, the question as to which
fascicles belong is obviously superfluous.
No comments:
Post a Comment