Five common fallacies concerning
Dogen (and Zen):
1. The
notion that duality, form, or delusion are of lesser status, significance, or
actuality than nonduality, emptiness, or enlightenment.
2. The
notion that the emphasis, style, or methodology of seated meditation (zazen,
shikantaza) in Dogen’s Zen is its most distinctive characteristic, or is
profoundly original or exceptionally unique.
3. The
notion that Dogen (or Zen generally) regarded language or textual study as
detrimental, superfluous, negligible, secondary, or inessential to authentic
Zen practice-enlightenment.
4. The
notion that Zen regards intellectual pursuits or capacities as detrimental, superfluous,
negligible, secondary, or inessential to authentic Zen practice-enlightenment.
5. The
notion that in Dogen’s Zen koan training and study is considered detrimental, superfluous,
negligible, secondary, or inessential to authentic Zen practice-enlightenment.
In contrast to these fallacies,
the views presented by Dogen’s vision of Zen are actually that:
1. Nonduality
and duality are coessential (i.e. each presupposes and is dependent on the
other), emptiness and form are coessential, delusion and enlightenment are
coessential.
2. Dogen’s vision of “nonthinking” demonstrates
the most essential, most original, and most characteristic aspect of Dogen’s
methodology concerning the nature of Zen practice-enlightenment. Sitting
meditation is given relatively little detailed attention in Dogen’s writings; what
guidance it does offer is generally consistent in style and methodology with
other sources of his era and earlier.
3. Language
and textual study are regarded as essential to authentic Zen practice-enlightenment.
4. Endeavors
in intellectual pursuit and the cultivation of discriminative and critical
capacities are regarded as essential to authentic Zen practice-enlightenment.
5. Extensive
and intensive koan training and study are regarded as essential to authentic
Zen practice-enlightenment.
All Buddhas and Buddhas teachings arise from this sutra. What is this sutra?
Ted
4 comments:
dogen was autistic and had semantic pragmatic disorder !
Hello an3drew,
Thank you for your comment.
What do you mean by "had" - did he cast it off or did it drop away of itself?
Thanks again.
Ted
interesting point, i think the semantic pragmatic disorder was transmuted beyond it's limitations : o)
at his best anyway :o)
unfortunately the vast majority of his work is bedevilled by scripting
i don't think he is really accessible to us because he is difficult to translate and generally or even exclusively the translations are poor quality coupled with textual problems !
it's apity about the tb, i think his expression was maturing at the time of his death : o)
Hello an3drew,
Thank you for your comment.
i see - you think his expression was maturing at the time of his death :o)
if so, it is, as you say, apity :o) i wonder what "mature expression" might look like :o)
Thanks again.
Ted
Post a Comment